|
It is currently 04 Sep 2010, 11:59
|
View unanswered posts | View active topics
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 9 posts ] |
|
| Author |
Message |
|
Shaun Culver
Site Admin
Joined: 25 Feb 2008, 13:32 Posts: 105 Location: Cape Town, South Africa
|
 Exercise [06.05]
_________________ “Our imagination is stretched to the utmost, not, as in fiction, to imagine things which are not really there, but just to comprehend those things which are there.”
Last edited by Shaun Culver on 18 Aug 2008, 02:57, edited 2 times in total.
|
| 26 Apr 2008, 18:31 |
|
 |
|
Shaun Culver
Site Admin
Joined: 25 Feb 2008, 13:32 Posts: 105 Location: Cape Town, South Africa
|
 Re: Exercise [6.5]
Something doesn't feel right about this. Please do point out what I've left out.
_________________ “Our imagination is stretched to the utmost, not, as in fiction, to imagine things which are not really there, but just to comprehend those things which are there.”
|
| 26 Apr 2008, 18:35 |
|
 |
|
Kurdt
Joined: 19 Mar 2008, 14:09 Posts: 36
|
 Re: Exercise [6.5]
Look Ok to me Shaun. You've just relabeled the infinite sum which is what you should do.
|
| 28 Apr 2008, 11:44 |
|
 |
|
Shaun Culver
Site Admin
Joined: 25 Feb 2008, 13:32 Posts: 105 Location: Cape Town, South Africa
|
 Re: Exercise [6.5]
Kurdt wrote: Look Ok to me Shaun. You've just relabeled the infinite sum which is what you should do. It seems too informal/glib. I suppose it's enough to get the idea across.
_________________ “Our imagination is stretched to the utmost, not, as in fiction, to imagine things which are not really there, but just to comprehend those things which are there.”
|
| 28 Apr 2008, 15:18 |
|
 |
|
Kurdt
Joined: 19 Mar 2008, 14:09 Posts: 36
|
 Re: Exercise [6.5]
Shaun Culver wrote: Kurdt wrote: Look Ok to me Shaun. You've just relabeled the infinite sum which is what you should do. It seems too informal/glib. I suppose it's enough to get the idea across. Well I'm a physicist so it works for me. I don't know what Laura would think. :p
|
| 28 Apr 2008, 15:37 |
|
 |
|
chag-art
Joined: 11 May 2008, 20:07 Posts: 11 Location: france
|
 Re: Exercise [6.5]
I think it would be better if there was the same index under and on the sum (it's just for your first line).
|
| 12 May 2008, 20:37 |
|
 |
|
Shaun Culver
Site Admin
Joined: 25 Feb 2008, 13:32 Posts: 105 Location: Cape Town, South Africa
|
 Re: Exercise [6.5]
chag-art wrote: I think it would be better if there was the same index under and on the sum (it's just for your first line). I agree.
_________________ “Our imagination is stretched to the utmost, not, as in fiction, to imagine things which are not really there, but just to comprehend those things which are there.”
|
| 12 May 2008, 20:45 |
|
 |
|
vasco
Supporter
Joined: 07 Jun 2008, 08:21 Posts: 182
|
 Re: Exercise [06.05]
Moving from  is not valid for n=0 since it implies that  or, given that 0! is 1, that  which is clearly false. This stems from the fact that:  is only valid for  Also when substituting k=n-1 the summation over k would have to start at k=-1 since when n=0 k=-1. It is better to write the proof as follows I think: {or to proceed as you did but say  since  when n=0, }Differentiating the series gives:  Letting  gives:   
Last edited by vasco on 03 Jul 2008, 13:11, edited 1 time in total.
|
| 03 Jul 2008, 12:02 |
|
 |
|
Shaun Culver
Site Admin
Joined: 25 Feb 2008, 13:32 Posts: 105 Location: Cape Town, South Africa
|
 Re: Exercise [06.05]
I agree. Thank you.
_________________ “Our imagination is stretched to the utmost, not, as in fiction, to imagine things which are not really there, but just to comprehend those things which are there.”
|
| 03 Jul 2008, 12:45 |
|
 |
|
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 9 posts ] |
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|