It is currently 04 Sep 2010, 12:24




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 
 Exercise [11.03] 
Author Message
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: 25 Feb 2008, 13:32
Posts: 105
Location: Cape Town, South Africa
Post Exercise [11.03]
If
q^{-1}=\bar{q}\left(q\bar{q}\right)^{-1}

Where
q=t+u i+v j+w k
\bar{q}=t-u i-v j-w k

Then
q^{-1}=\bar{q}\left(q\bar{q}\right)^{-1}

\frac{1}{(t+u i+v j+w k)}=\frac{(t-u i-v j-w k)}{(t+u i+v j+w k)(t-u i-v j-w k)}

\frac{1}{(t+u i+v j+w k)(t-u i-v j-w k)}=\frac{1}{(t+u i+v j+w k)(t-u i-v j-w k)}
\frac{1}{t^2+u^2 +v^2 +w^2}=\frac{1}{t^2+u^2 +v^2 +w^2}

1=1


The inverse quaternion is equal to the quaternion conjugate multiplied by the inverse of the norm.

_________________
Our imagination is stretched to the utmost, not, as in fiction, to imagine things which are not really there, but just to comprehend those things which are there.


Last edited by Shaun Culver on 28 May 2008, 17:57, edited 3 times in total.
Edited


25 May 2008, 01:33
Profile WWW

Joined: 12 Mar 2008, 10:57
Posts: 69
Location: India
Post Re: Exercise [11.3]
The conjugate is defined by,
\overline{q}=t-ui-vj-wk
The inverse satisfies
q^{-1}q=qq^{-1}=1
We define q^{-1}=\frac{\overline{q}}{(q\overline{q})}
This definition works because
qq^{-1}=q\frac{\overline{q}}{(q\overline{q})}=\frac{q\overline{q}}{(q\overline{q})}=\frac{t^2+u^2+v^2+w^2}{t^2+u^2+v^2+w^2}=1and
q^{-1}q=\frac{\overline{q}}{(q\overline{q})}q=\frac{\overline{q}q}{(q\overline{q})}=\frac{t^2+u^2+v^2+w^2}{t^2+u^2+v^2+w^2}=1
(because q\overline{q}=\overline{q}q;see[11.2])
P.S.Shaun,your argument should go like this.
q^{-1}=\frac{1}{(t+ui+vj+wk)}=\frac{(t-ui-vj-wk)}{(t+ui+vj+wk)(t-ui-vj-wk)}
=\frac{\overline{q}}{t^2+u^2+v^2+w^2}=\frac{\overline{q}}{(q\overline{q})}


26 May 2008, 10:32
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: 25 Feb 2008, 13:32
Posts: 105
Location: Cape Town, South Africa
Post Re: Exercise [11.3]
I've modified the solution slightly.

Is there something wrong with my argument?

_________________
Our imagination is stretched to the utmost, not, as in fiction, to imagine things which are not really there, but just to comprehend those things which are there.


26 May 2008, 17:33
Profile WWW

Joined: 12 Mar 2008, 10:57
Posts: 69
Location: India
Post Re: Exercise [11.3]
Initially the argument did have an error,but you seem to have spotted it and corrected it.


27 May 2008, 09:25
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group.
Designed by Vjacheslav Trushkin for Free Forums/DivisionCore.