It is currently 04 Sep 2010, 12:36




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] 
 Exercise [06.02] 
Author Message

Joined: 12 Mar 2008, 10:57
Posts: 69
Location: India
Post Exercise [06.02]
Before giving the proof I need to state a few definitions.
Let D be the set of all differentiable functions.
Let
P=\{p(x)|p(x)=\sum{a_{k}x^{-k}},k\in{Z^{+}},a_k,x\in{R},x\ is\ not\ 0\}
The following properties about P can easily proved.
1.Ifp_1,p_2\in{P} then p_{1}p_{2}\in{P}.
(\sum{a_{i}x^{-i}}\sum{b_{j}x^{-j}}=\sum{a_{i}b_{j}x^{-(i+j)}})
2.Ifp_1,p_2\in{P} then p_{1}+p_{2}\in{P}.
(\sum{a_{k}x^{-k}}+\sum{b_{k}x^{-k}=\sum{(a_{k}+b_{k})x^{-k}}})
3.Ifp(x)\in{P}thenp\in{D}and\ p'(x)\in{P}.
(\frac{d}{dx}(\sum{a_{k}x^{-k}})=\sum{-ka_{k}x^{-(k+1)}})
Now let
S=\{f(x)|f(x)\in{D},f'(x)=f(x).p_{1}(x)where\ p_{1}(x)\in{P}\}
We now prove an amazing theorem,
If f\in{S}then,f can be differentiated infinitely many times.
PROOF:(BY INDUCTION)
f\in{S}\Rightarrow\ f'(x)=f(x).p_{1}(x)
Assumef^{k}(x)=f(x).p_{k}(x)wherep_{k}(x)\in{P}
As f(x),p_{k}(x)\in{D},f(x).p_{k}(x)\in{D}orf^{n+1}(x)exists.
Now,
f^{n+1}(x)=f(x).p'_{k}(x)+p_{k}(x)f'(x)=f(x)\{p'_{k}(x)+p_{k}(x).p_{k}(x)\}
Let \ p_{k+1}=\{p'_{k}(x)+p_{k}(x).p_{k}(x)\}
Using properties 1,2 and 3
p_{k+1}\in{P}
Hence
f^{k+1}(x)=f(x).p_{k+1}(x)
By induction the theorem is thus valid for all n\in{Z^{+}}

Now to the actual problem.We have the function
h(x)=0\ for\ x\leq{0}Hence, h is C^{\infty}smooth for non-positive values of x.
Also,
h(x)=e^{\frac{-1}{x}}\ for\ x\ greater\ than\ 0
In this case,h(x)\in{S}and is againC^{\infty}smooth for positive x.
Thus,h(x)\ is\ C^{\infty}smooth\forall{x\in{R}}


16 May 2008, 12:16
Profile
Supporter
Supporter

Joined: 07 Jun 2008, 08:21
Posts: 182
Post Re: Exercise [06.02]
The main problem with this proof is that it avoids the issue of the derivatives of h(x) at x=0 and the fact that e^{-1/x} is not defined at the origin.

This is the crux of the whole problem:

The definition of the derivative requires that the two limits as x approaches the origin from the left and from the right not only exist but are equal.
This is not demonstrated in this proof.

What the proof DOES show is that the derivatives of e^{-1/x} are all of the form e^{-1/x}\cdot P(1/x) for x\ne 0, where P(1/x) is a polynomial in 1/x


28 Jul 2009, 16:11
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] 


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group.
Designed by Vjacheslav Trushkin for Free Forums/DivisionCore.