|
|
|
|
It is currently 04 Sep 2010, 13:05
|
View unanswered posts | View active topics
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 7 posts ] |
|
| Author |
Message |
|
Sameed Zahoor
Joined: 12 Mar 2008, 10:57 Posts: 69 Location: India
|
 Exercise [07.01]
Let  where n is an integer. If n is not equal to -1 then,   If n=-1, 
|
| 13 May 2008, 11:11 |
|
 |
|
dacrespi
Joined: 28 Mar 2008, 21:15 Posts: 2
|
 Re: Exercise [7.1]
I m new in complex analysis. Thank you very much!! Diego
|
| 20 May 2008, 22:23 |
|
 |
|
jamestzara
Joined: 09 Jun 2008, 09:50 Posts: 2
|
 Re: Exercise [07.01]
Great!
I wonder, though, seeing as this exercise is marked as "very straight forward" and therefore easily obtainable to the layman, whether an alternative solution would be to note that since there is no ambiguity in raising complex numbers to the power of an integer, the only available contour is one which traverses positively from a to b and then back again, cancelling itself out and yielding zero? The exercise seems to require something that "explains" the result rather than just showing it.
|
| 09 Jun 2008, 10:37 |
|
 |
|
vasco
Supporter
Joined: 07 Jun 2008, 08:21 Posts: 182
|
 Re: Exercise [07.01]
Yes I agree and here is a simpler way to see it. Remember that  is a single-valued function of  , unlike  , which is multi-valued.  where  and  are any two points in the complex plane and   For a closed loop  and because  is single-valued the integral vanishes and can be written as 
|
| 09 Jul 2008, 15:41 |
|
 |
|
Sameed Zahoor
Joined: 12 Mar 2008, 10:57 Posts: 69 Location: India
|
 Re: Exercise [07.01]
vasco wrote: Yes I agree and here is a simpler way to see it. Remember that  is a single-valued function of  , unlike  , which is multi-valued.  where  and  are any two points in the complex plane and   For a closed loop  and because  is single-valued the integral vanishes and can be written as  You are correct,Vasco. However,the reason I wrote the solution in polar-form was to extend the domain of its applicability.The problem specifically mentions 'n+1' to be an integer.But by using polar forms one can also regard 'n+1' as rational or a surd. In such a case,  is not zero.This treatment will help to understand more about Riemann Surfaces which have been analysed in the next chapter.For example,if n+1=p/q then the integral vanishes only when 'p' is an integral multiple of q.So the corresponding Riemann Surface is a spiral ramp in which the spiral sheets rejoin after 'q' turns.
|
| 10 Jul 2008, 07:13 |
|
 |
|
tensor
Joined: 30 May 2009, 19:48 Posts: 2
|
 Re: Exercise [07.01]
I think your solution Sameed is the most straightforward, but I'm uncomfortable with you converting  into polar form after you have integrated. What's your justification for not substituting  with the line integral's limits? Why are you including it?
|
| 16 Jul 2009, 23:36 |
|
 |
|
vasco
Supporter
Joined: 07 Jun 2008, 08:21 Posts: 182
|
 Re: Exercise [07.01]
I think the point is that in the contour integral you start at a point  and then go round once back to the point  , but  has now increased by  so the limits of the integral are  and (  .
|
| 28 Jul 2009, 18:46 |
|
 |
|
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 7 posts ] |
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|